Kaanib flame part 2

I’m really flattered that this guy even went to the trouble of searching my whole archive for posts against his cult. No wonder my hit count shot up yesterday. :)

Praise God! How wonderful it is, to see my own commentary on the Good News spread even to the far reaches of opposing beliefs’ message boards! Even when it is responded to with insults and name-calling, I will rejoice. Christ Himself told us, “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad, for great is your reward in heaven…” – Matt 5:11-12

I’m not “Justyn,” guys. I’m just a man who saw their work, bought them a domain, and made a HTML template to help in their ministry. Not everyone who says something against Ang Dating Daan is necessarily a Berean contributor, you know.

Blessings to you in Christ!


  1. Keren says:

    Indeed! :)

  2. Simply Red says:

    You have to have the proof to back up your belief that Ang Dating Daan is a cult. Unless you can support it with a very strong evidence, that would be considered a libel and slander. Thank you.

  3. Paulo says:

    I have merely expressed my beliefs as a Bible Christian, Simply Red, while someone from Kaanib.net has called me “impakto,” branded me a liar, and accused me of being a Berean, which I am not .

    If anyone is in any position to yell bloody “libel and slander!” it is not you, but I. But I won’t, because ADD squabbles are simply too far beneath my attention, and the Holy Spirit — the prompting of God Himself — moves me only to gentleness and patience.

    To qualify, I believe that ADD is a cult because they deny salvation by grace through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ, they deny the Trinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and they run a religion which, as far as I have seen, consists only of bashing other faiths. These are what I regard as among cultic qualities, and you cannot take me to task for that regard.

    It is my right to hold these beliefs and express them in opposition to a cult’s doctrines, just as much as Eli Soriano has every right to call people names on his TV show till his face is blue. You want to make something of it, you bring it up with an impartial lawyer. He’ll tell you how much of a leg you have to stand on.

    May God bless you! Faith “alone” cannot save a man unless it is completed by works, but first know what works are the works of God: John 6:28-29. ;)

    Keep bashing me, keep persecuting me. You only add to my reward in Heaven, which, unlike an ADD-member, I am fully assured of in grace through faith, by Christ alone. Praise Jesus, our Lord and Savior, who takes away our sins. :)

  4. caths says:

    Well said, Paulo. You inspire me to continue to run the race.

  5. Simply Red says:

    I can’t blame if you believe that ADD denies grace and the trinity. You probably have your own interpretation of the scriptures for you to arrive at that conclusion. We can’t say that a person is biblically wrong unless we know the right biblical interpretation. How can ADD believe in trinity and some born again doctrines if they go against the teachings of the bible? You might say ADD is wrong and ADD might also believe that you are wrong, so the best and proper way to settle this dispute is to exchange your views with them in a proper debate so that we may know who has the right interpretation of the scriptures. This is why ADD is challenging all the sects to prove their doctrines and to refute his doctrines

  6. Paulo says:

    Doctrines are not proven or refuted by rigged TV show debates. Our views of salvation stand on Scripture and Christ, and not by the personal interpretation of a prominent individual. Proper interpretation is onlyby the power of the Holy Spirit.

    “That if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved!” – from the Epistle to the Romans.

    That cannot be interpreted any other way.

  7. ghodhereek says:

    You were right Paulo.

  8. testing says:


  9. ria says:

    God bless you Paulo for handling this well. If their answer to an expression of honest opinion or belief is name-calling, then they only show their true level, which is not as ‘speaking through the prompting of the holy spirit’.

    The right response in my opinion, simply red, is to ask the Holy Spirit to reveal to you God’s truth and search the scriptures, humbly and openly – without preconceived ideas and biases.