WP-DC13 and Cellphones for Soldiers

WP-DC13 Cell Phones for Soldiers

I recently ordered a WP-DC13 camera housing (above left) so I can bring my SD1000 diving next time I’m in the Philippines. When it arrived, the Amazon box included a little plastic sleeve marked “Cellphones for Soldiers” (above right), an interesting little project started by a pair of teenagers to recycle people’s old cellphones by donating them to military personnel in need of phones to contact loved ones back home. Putting aside questions of war and Iraq, I’m wondering if this doesn’t have security implications — soldiers calling family via prepaid cards in the Middle East?

Note from reading the FAQ that most of the cellphones donated don’t actually go to soldiers since they’re not GSM, and instead are sold to a recycler who pays for prepaid cards to send to the soldiers.

As for the housing, it looks great and fits the camera well, but I still need to take it on two test dives in the bathtub sometime — one “unmanned” safety dive without a camera and one “manned” dive with the camera. Then we’ll see how it works. With photos of me in the tub! Bet you’re looking forward to that, eh?

Corn and Magazine

Spotted yesterday while lining up at Whole Foods: someone appears to have decided he didn’t want this ear of corn anymore, so he stuffed it in the InStyle magazine rack. Classy.

Corn and Magazines

Caturday!

Once again, you’re seeing this Sunday because I forgot to post it yesterday, but I’m backdating it to Saturday so that no one will know. Ssshh, our secret. Anyway, as of late Pandora’s new favorite hangout spot has gradually moved from right in the doorway to right by the dirty laundry area, where she seems to enjoy the texture of old clothes spilling out of the basket onto the carpet:

IMG_0142.JPG IMG_0151.JPG IMG_0154.JPG IMG_0155.JPG IMG_0156.JPG

IMG_0144.JPG IMG_0150.JPG

The sweatshirt she is nesting in has since been laundered.

Eduardo San Juan and the Lunar Rover: the MOLAB Study

Continuing my inquiry into the legend of Eduardo San Juan and the lunar rover, you’ll remember that I sent an email to historians at NASA and Boeing to ask about him. Mike Wright of the Marshall Space Flight Center History Office emailed back with a very interesting PDF attached: a report and conceptual design for the possible construction of a lunar shelter and roving vehicle, submitted to NASA MSFC in November 1964 by “E.C. San Juan” of Hayes International Corporation. The document is just one of a series of “Apollo Logistics Support Systems” papers submitted by Hayes engineers as part of a NASA MSFC contract to research lunar surface exploration technologies for a project called “MOLAB,” which would later be cancelled.

Looking over San Juan’s work, it looks like he was an engineer who knew his way around aerospace concepts and hardware, with lots of math and physics and charts — although sections of the report lapse into pithy exposition of basic concepts in descriptive astronomy and spaceflight which I thought would be common knowledge to anyone receiving this at MSFC. The lunar terrain rover (LTV) is part of a larger proposed “lunar base” package composed of a lander with a two-man shelter/laboratory module (SHELAB), a one-man lunar rover, and a spacesuit-attachable rocket belt.

Illustration of San Juan's proposed SHELAB/LTV

The SHELAB/LTV concept might appear remarkably prescient, superficially resembling Grumman’s Lunar Module five years before Apollo 11, and Boeing/Delco’s Lunar Rover seven years before Apollo 15. This is better placed in context, however, considering that this comes about two years after MSFC accepted the Grumman LM contract, and knowing that the design influences of Von Braun, Bekker, and Pavlics had already informed a whole generation of spacecraft designers since the 1950s. Given the recollections that San Juan’s daughter has of MSFC, I can easily believe that he did indeed have access to NASA material and personnel while putting together the MOLAB study, including Wernher Von Braun himself.

Given this, we can conclude that San Juan conceptualized a lunar rover along the lines of existing work in the field, but not the rover finally contracted to Boeing and GM/Delco for Apollo 15, 16, and 17. Nikodemski gives us the word on that.

(In some ways, I wish the MOLAB project had pushed through; it looks remarkably ambitious with the equipment proposed by the Hayes study. Note how the scale of their lunar lander is much larger than the Grumman LM, and part of the plan involved a network of LMs forming a decentralized lunar base. I’m sure Von Braun would have approved.)

Next entry, I’ll explore the differences and similarities between San Juan’s proposed rover and the actual Apollo LRV.

Space Get – a small change

The three or four of you who follow Space Get may have noticed a little change in the weblog description: it now just says “Spaceflight video sticky-ball,” omitting mention of “images and other media.” The reason: easy embed fields on YouTube and Google Video.

When I want to post an image (usually NASA public domain photos), the process goes like this: save image locally, upload to Blogger, decide on a size and alignment, tweak Blogger’s auto-generated image tag, give title, publish. When it comes to video, however, it’s a simpler matter involving no file transfer: copy URL to Link field, copy embed code to body, give title, publish. A step or two shorter, no messy save/open dialog boxes, much time saved.

It seems ironic that still images should be harder to post than moving videos, but the YouTube model of offering open embedding really clinches it, making videos much faster to post than photos — and if posting to Space Get weren’t a fast affair it wouldn’t be tenable for me. Plus, I don’t need to worry about storage or bandwidth limits. Perhaps if I could implement an imgred-like solution, or if someone on Flickr had a huge cache of current and historical iconic spaceflight imagery, I might do photos more often, but as it is, Space Get is more about videos now.

Also, video is way more awesome. It’s moving pictures!

(As a concession, I’ve added a feed links box to the Space Get sidebar, grabbing links from my del.icio.us space tag. Those links will often contain imagery.)

AAC.jpg

AAC.jpg Large banner-type art thing hanging outside the front of the Arlington Arts Center. Update: Amy tells me it is The 0 Project.

(AAC.jpg uploaded by brownpau.)

Batasan Bombing

Another explosion in the Philippines: the Batasang Pambansa in Quezon City, home to Congress. Police are pretty sure that this was an actual bomb targeted to kill Basilan Congressman Wahab Akbar as he left the building (unlike the Glorietta blast which they now say was an accident).

(Note that the Batasang Pambansa is the House of Representatives, formerly the home of Parliament, distinct from the Senate which is GSIS Building in Pasay City, a different part of Metro Manila.)

More from Inquirer, GMA News, ABS-CBN News, BBC, New York Times, Pinoyexchange, Amee, MLQ3.

The response is, as with Glorietta, resounding cynicism. Few seem to believe Glorietta was an accident, and with the president facing impeachment and the Philippines’ notorious history of political foul play, the unsettled populace can’t help but compare these blasts with the fake ambush of Enrile which Marcos used as a pretext for martial law.

Still, considering the tribal/warlordist aspect of Filipino provincial politics, I could see a political power play in Basilan bringing on a brazen attack like this, too.

I withhold judgment as I watch how the spectacle unfolds from afar.

Update: Akbar was the target, says the PNP. Akbar has former associations with the Abu Sayyaf, and rebelled against them, establishing a dictatorial reign of terror during his prior governorship. This is Philippine-style feudal provincial politics with terror tactics and connections mixed in. Also see MLQ3’s column, House in the Line of Fire.