Recent Museum-ing (and Zoo-ing)

In the Beginning: Exhibit of ancient bibles from before the year 1000 AD at the Sackler Gallery. The earliest fragments at the start of the exhibit were what interested me most: a preserved scrap of Dead Sea Scroll, pieces of Coptic manuscripts of John and Matthew, parchments and papyrus and vellum with canonized and apocryphal texts on them alike, in Greek and Coptic and Syrian and Georgian, even a lovely spread from Codex Sinaiticus. The exhibit is wonderfully lacking in the breathless conspiracy revisionism with which “The Da Vinci Code” craze and the more recent “Gospel of Judas” exhibit have been so fond of creating controversy. Rather, exhibit descriptions present the manuscript samples in simple, straightforward history, passing neither positive nor negative judgment on the Bible or its faith, and subtly giving the lie to common fallacies like late authorship or constant change in the text.

The Uncertainty of Objects and Ideas: Recent sculpture at the Hirshhorn Gallery. I wasn’t too fond of the free-standing pieces glued together from “found” objects, but Björn Dahlem was the exception. Very nice radial work.

Constable’s Great Lanscapes: They’re called “great” because they were six feet across and often preceded by oil sketches of equal size, but all in all I didn’t think they were that great. Lots of scale, but up close, not much detail that couldn’t have been experienced if the painting were smaller. One landscape which had had a rainbow added to it at a later date came dangerously close to Thomas Cole-esque mawkishness.

The Streets of New York: American Photographs from the Collection, 1938-1958: Walker Evans’ candid subway shots and Helen Levitt’s photos of children at play made the whole exhibit for me. I was expecting to see a lot more of New York as it was in the last century, but people seemed to be the preferred subjects over urban landscapes.

Asia Trail: The National Zoo’s new Asia Trail is a lovely addition, with large glass-enclosed habitats for Sloth Bears, Small Clawed Otters, and Fishing Cats, and huge spaces for the pandas. The winding paths are conducive to wandering, and the new footbridge makes access to the aviary much easier. I close now with a photo of the small-clawed otters, with a zoom in on the good bits:

Small Clawed Otters

Early Winter for this Tree

(IMG_8726.JPG, uploaded by brownpau.)

Fall is here, and the leaves are turning colors, but it looks like this venerable old elm on the US Capitol grounds can’t wait for winter. (Botanic specialists, correct me if I’m wrong on that tree classification.)

DC General Election 2006

Elections today! DC general elections are rarely as exciting as the primaries, since this is a mostly Democratic town, so it’s sort of given that the Democratic candidates will simply be reconfirmed by the overwhelming majority of voters who gave them the primary slot to begin with. Still, there are wildcards in the equation, the one closest to home for me being the Ward 6 race. I’ll be voting today according to the Smokefree DC General Election Endorsements, which means I select Will Cobb for Ward 6 Council Chair.

DCDL has a list of DC general election candidates with links to candidate websites.

IMG_8720.JPG Update: Okay, all done voting. Here’s how it went: (photo of ballot at right)

House Rep: Norton

Mayor: Fenty

Council Chairman: Gray

Council At-Large: Mendelson, Catania

Ward 6 Council: Cobb

Shadow Senator: Brown

Shadow Rep: Panetta

Board of Education: Bobb, Raymond

ANC6C: Wirt

As a general election postscript, I really love that this is the first thing I see when I come out of my voting precinct:

IMG_8721.JPG

Lazy Pandora in Black and White

The cat’s been a bit ill lately, with a touch of conjunctivitis, coughing, and urinary distress. But she’s getting better now. Here she is in black and white, being adorable and lazy as always:

IMG_8695.JPG

IMG_8699.JPG IMG_8693.JPG

Lost 3.05: Tell The Black Smoke You’re Sorry

I think we’ve established with this episode that the Black Smoke is some kind of telepathically attuned entity which is capable of manifesting as certain persons from a character’s past, possibly via the restoration and reanimation of dead bodies it finds in wreckage. Past LOST storylines have emphasized the importance of a character coming to terms with an internal conflict by finding redemption in forgiveness, repentance, or simple closure. When Eko’s method of coming to terms with his brother Yemi involved a prideful rather than humbly repentant approach, (thus cementing Eko’s reputation as a bad theologian — reference his baptism gaffe) Smoke-Yemi disowned him as a brother. Smack then proceeded to be laid down, ridding the island of yet another actor whose driving had run him afoul of Hawaii’s Finest.

That leaves only one Tail Section survivor in the group, not counting those kidnapped by the Others: Bernard, who has not been seen since the second season finale. What was the point of the whole Tail Section subplot, then? To provide a pool of disposable characters whose deaths could be used to generate TV magazine buzz without actually disrupting the core storyline too much?

I did like the explanation for Eko’s building a church on the island. Originally I had thought of it as a sign that some of the survivors would want to stay on the island rather than be rescued, and he was preparing to provide for their long-term spiritual nourishment, but the revelation that he was instead executing a personal form of penance for his brother (owing Yemi one church) is a far more profound explanation in line with his character development.

While I was prepared for Eko’s death and Ben’s spinal tumor from various spoilers, Juliet’s treacherous Cue Card Message came totally out of left field. Blew me away. Of course Jack’s whole dilemma at this point is whom and what to believe: is there really deathly dissent among the Others, or are Ben and Juliet conspiring to create the appearance of dissent so as to sway his surgical sympathies towards Ben? After all, Ben did say that he wanted Jack to want to operate. On the other hand, certain third-person scenes have shown Ben and Juliet in a subtle power struggle with each other, so she could be upping the ante behind his back. If indeed her cue cards were sincere, Juliet says in her silent message that Ben is a dangerous liar — but this audaciously murderous plan shows her as being fairly dangerous too, as Sawyer pointed out in the previous episode. This should make for an interesting three-pointed conflict as Jack makes his decision.

Subterfuge or no, I really do enjoy Ben’s candor with Jack. His spiel about the whole plan to “break” Jack with an inculcation of emotional investment was an excellent extension of the Of Mice and Men allusion, i.e. “the best laid plans.” One nugget of insight: the plane crash wasn’t a deliberate act carried out by the Others. If the “book club” teaser didn’t put that theory to rest, then Ben’s own profession of the plane crash as a fortuitous act of God should — it wasn’t something he expected to happen.

Yeah, yeah, Pearl Station, Eyepatch Guy, Paulo using the toilet, etc., etc. Thanks to the writers for actually throwing in a few lines to clarify that Paulo and Nikki aren’t part of the “inner circle” that Arzt previously complained about, and throwing them that bone via Locke’s new leadership ethic of inclusiveness. It’s a far better way to introduce the characters than that whiny start Nikki got earlier. Why do I get the feeling that Paulo and Nikki are there as amalgamations of Shannon, Boone, and Ana Lucia, though?

More from Penny Arcade, TV Squad, Easy Does It U, The Tail Section, MostlyMuppet, Nik at Nite, and Moxie.

LOST 3.04: Oh My Darling Clementine

Note: This entry is about the third season LOST episode “Every Man for Himself,” in which Sawyer learns in a flashback that he may have a daughter named Clementine. (Or, possibly, Cassidy was trying to con him using the ruse of a fake child.) Those of you searching for the American folk ballad Oh My Darling Clementine, please look here.

Paulo and Nikki

Remember the Poochie episode of The Simpsons, where alongside the “Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie” story arc, “Roy” suddenly appeared with the family, completely out of nowhere, and was treated as though he had always been around? It was, of course, a gag referencing shows which pull “Cousin Oliver” maneuvers on their audiences, and I got the same feeling from the introduction of Paulo and Nikki. You have Nikki yelling familiarly at Hurley, “When were you planning on telling us this?”, amd Desmond talking golf with Paulo, what’s essentially a day or two after the 2nd season finale. How hard would it have been to have an expository fifteen second “who are you” scene similar to what Ethan or Dr. Arzt got? Maybe Charlie going “Who are those?” to Hurley, and Hurley going, “Oh, that’s Pau and Nikki. They were on the manifest. Cute, isn’t she?” Or something like that.

On Sawyer and Kate

I do believe this is the first episode that I’ve heard Sawyer call Kate by her name rather than “Freckles.” Also, after Kate’s whole second season “I’m sorry I kissed you” heart to heart with Jack, I guess she’s made her decision. Remember how the tension between Jack and Sawyer was a reflection of her own inner conflict over her “good” and “bad” fathers in What Kate Did? I guess she’s coming to terms with being Bad Dad’s daughter.

Psychic Intercom

Juliet says the intercom doesn’t work, but Jack keeps hearing things from it. Wires crossed with Ben’s surveillance system, or is it some DHARMA-induced psychic ability emerging on Jack’s part, manifesting to him via his perception of his surroundings? (That is, he thinks the sound is coming from the intercom, but it’s actually how his disoriented mind interprets its own latent telephathy.) Might be related to his visions of his dead father, and the way the Island has “talked” to Kate and Locke about their tortured pasts via the unconscious Sawyer and Eko respectively.

Another Island

The “pacemaker” con was a brilliant little twist in Sawyer’s character development, bunny and all. But there’s that big question about the “other island” that Ben showed him: how did the Losties miss seeing it? The prevailing theory I favor is that if the island is contained in a closed cosmic loop (what Desmond called the “snow globe”) all one need do is walk far enough to go in a circle — or see the other side of the island.

Killers

“Because we’re not killers,” says Ben. The necks of Charlie and Nathan would beg to differ.

Air and Space Museum Demotes Pluto: Update

More museum news for the Demote Pluto front: in addition to the removal of Pluto from the list of planet symbols, the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum’s Exploring the Planets exhibit has updated some of its solar system displays to clarify Pluto’s new status as a “Dwarf Planet,” and added an “In Memoriam” poster to explain the classification change.

mo_619_.jpg IMG_8653.JPG

IMG_8655.JPG

Many thanks to the NASM for being frank and sensible about the progress of our understanding of the solar system while also graciously giving acknowledgment to Pluto’s historical status in the course of human astronomical study, and special kudos to the exhibit copywriters for avoiding BTQ abuse.

Note on Family Nomenclature

According to the Relatives Chart, the standard English label for a first cousin’s child would be “first cousin, once removed.” Filipinos, however, use the term “pamangkin” — preferably translated to English as “nephew” or “niece” — to clarify the generational removal, distinguishing cousins (“pinsan”) from their children, as well as from more distant relatives further up the tree who would also qualify as removed cousins in the standard nomenclature.

Hence, whenever I use the words “nephew” or “niece,” it’s just as likely to refer to any of my many cousins’ children as to my brother’s boy. As a corollary, when I refer to an “uncle” or “aunt” (or the Tagalog “tito” or “tita”), I may mean a relative of greater than first degree who is above me or my parents on the family tree.

An Open Letter to Pingdom.com on the Topic of Referrer Spam

Update, 11/16/2006: Pingdom responds.

Please note also that JDCDesigns is innocent: jdcdesigns.com.


Hello! Lately I’ve been noticing hits in my referrer logs from pages on pingdom.com which seem to be linking to my site, but when clicked through, do not actually exist. The false hits are coming from 66.98.148.24, which is a server on EV1 used by jdcdesigns.com. User agent is “Pingdom GIGRIB v1.1 (http://www.pingdom.com)”. It seems the idea is to provide a pointer to an uptime monitoring page, but the link to the supposed page just 404s and redirects to the index page, which strikes me as being either buggy or deceptive. May I know why I would be getting what appears to be referrer log spam for pingdom.com from jdcdesigns.com?

Update: EV1 forum entry by JDC Designs regarding DNS problems caused by a spammer formerly at that IP. It looks like JDC may be suffering the misfortune of a bad server history, or some unpatched vulnerability.

Update: Response from Pingdom:

Our development team is doing some research which involves scanning off large parts of the Internet. It is not something specific for your site. A visit from us will not show up more than a maximum of 3-5 times per month, and will not take any more resources than a regular website visitor would (less, actually). We hope this is not a bother.

The hits are continuing, and it seems a lot more often than 3-5 times per month. Pingdom and JDCDesigns both appear to be legitimate services, but I wish that Pingdom would execute site crawls with a blank referrer, or else with a referrer pointing to a working page with an actual link to the site, so as to avoid the appearance of deceptive marketing practices. As it is, I consider this referrer spam.