Owning the Clouds – Apology, Withdrawal

Followup to Owning The Clouds and the update: I got an email from Sarah Bernard of 23/6, apologizing for the inadvertent pulling of my video due to Google/YouTube’s content identification. I forgive you, 23/6!

Dear Paulo,

I’m Sarah Bernard, President of 23/6. Please know that we certainly did not intend for our posting the video, “A Message to Rudy from Anonymous,” on YouTube to result in your work being blocked; it appears that blocking was an inadvertent result of YouTube’s content identification program. When we learned that your work was blocked, we worked with YouTube to remedy the situation as quickly as we could.

I’m sorry to hear about the unintended effect. It wasn’t intentional on our part.

Best,

Sarah Bernard

Meanwhile, the cloud timelapse video has been unavailable to me for more than a week at this point. Despite two emails from Google Video saying that the video is back up, they still have not restored the original cloud video page — at least, not for any IP address I check it from. (Interestingly enough, a bunch of international users have commented to say that they can see it.) I tried emailing one more time to ask if there was a problem, and got the following form response: (Note the addressee name. I’m not Alex.)

Hi Alex,

We’re always working to provide comprehensive online assistance, and we believe that the answer to your question can be found within the following help center link: [link]

If you have additional questions, we recommend that you review the Google Video Help Center at http://video.google.com/support/ for our most up-to-date information. You might also try our Google Video Help Group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Video-Help

Finally, if you’re still having trouble finding an answer to your question, you can respond to this email. Please keep in mind, though, that we’ll only be able to respond to your note if we can provide information that isn’t currently available in the online resources above.

We appreciate your taking the time to write to us.

Sincerely,

The Google Team

Sigh. I’ve done this by email, on my weblog, and on Google Groups, and still I get an “unavailable” error screen, despite the video status showing as “Live” on my video uploads admin page (inset in image below):

Screenshot of error page with inset of admin video status

This is EPIC FAIL on a massive level that I would never have expected from Google. After more than a week of my content being unavailable due to a botched automated infringement takedown, they continue to ignore a simple request to restore a two minute video, then respond with the wrong form letter.

Since I can no longer trust Google Video to keep my content up, protect my rights against erroneous infringement claims, respect my authorship, or even provide automated support addressed to the correct user, I’m now in the process of removing all my videos from Google Video and YouTube. My stuff will instead be uploaded to Flickr and Vimeo, and all corresponding embeds on my site will change as well.

Memorial Day 2008

Amy and I spent most of Memorial Day relaxing at home, though we did go out for a few hours to grab a sushi lunch at Mary Surratt’s boarding house (AKA Wok and Roll), browse the Reynolds Center, and walk around the Haupt Garden.

Eternal Father, Strong to Save

The Fortune

I don’t normally have a high degree of trust for Asian “fusion” type restaurants like Wok and Roll, whose identity and menu hover between Chinese and Japanese without fully committing to either, but the quality of their food of either genre is unquestionably good, and their salmon sushi has an amazingly perfect oily, melty, squishy feel which sends shudders of pleasure through my frame, so I make exception for this particular establishment. The Chinese end of their repertoire also means that the sushi dinner is followed by fortune cookies, something the itamae at a pure Japanese bar would probably skip on providing with the check. Amy’s particular fortune this day was accompanied by a joyful/ominous Chinese word lesson on the flip side of the strip:

Fortune, front and back

For the record, this fortune remains currently unfulfilled.

Best of SAAM Comments

Stuffed with sushi and fortune cookies, we headed for the Reynolds Center to look at Hip Hop Portraits, plus other more mainstream classical works in the SAAM. One particularly entertaining highlight of the trip was an open “Visitors’ Comments” notebook in one gallery, many of whose pages provided some small amusement:

Visitors' Comments Notebook, SAAM Visitors' Comments Notebook, SAAM Visitors' Comments Notebook, SAAM Visitors' Comments Notebook, SAAM

Castle Garden

From there we traipsed down 6th Street past the Navy Memorial and National Archives, through the Museum of Natural History’s outdoor Butterfly Habitat Garden, across the Mall, around the Castle, and into the Haupt Garden, where I tested my macro skills on flowers and fountains:

IMG_2628.JPG IMG_2629.JPG

IMG_2614.JPG IMG_2625.JPG

Bird and Squirrel

We close now with two rather blurry animal videos: a bird (possibly a lark) making noises in a tree, and a nervous squirrel with a nut in its mouth.

Quite a relaxing day, with surprisingly minimal people-traffic around spots normally congested with tourists. See more in the DC Weekends May 2008 photoset.

Phoenix on Mars

Phoenix, NASA/JPL’s new Mars polar lander, has successfully touched down in the Martian north polar region. This landing was more of a nail-biter than usual, given that the last polar lander mission was lost during descent in 1999; but Phoenix (rising from the ashes of the Mars Polar Lander mission, I guess) performed wonderfully, going through its seven minutes of terror in a near-flawless EDL, coming to rest smoothly and safely on a flat, almost perfectly-level Martian plain.

I was watching the event live simultaneously on NASA TV and in Second Life, and was as excited as everyone else at JPL to see the first photos come in:

Phoenix Mars Lander - first raw images Phoenix Mars Lander - first raw images Phoenix Mars Lander - first raw images Phoenix Mars Lander - first raw images

Just as amazing is this photo from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which captures Phoenix during descent, hanging from its parachute — a historic first for unmanned spacecraft-to-spacecraft interplanetary photography. The fact that Phoenix landed at all is reason enough for celebration; these additional tech perks — a parachute photo and a flawless descent — must make the mission engineers and scientists positively giddy with Martian delight.

And this is just the start. Over the next ninety Martian days, Phoenix will begin digging into the soil to search for water ice, signs of organic compounds, and possibly life — or its remnants. Congratulations and continued wishes of good luck to the JPL crew — and of course, don’t forget the rovers, still running after four [Earth] years on the Martian surface.

Additional links:

Baltimore Aquarium

Amy and I took a train up to Baltimore on Saturday to drop off a painting for 15×15, so while we were in town we took a few hours to drop by the Aquarium. I had unfortunately forgotten my camera, so I was limited to my phone, but it sufficed for photos and lots of video too:

Frog on Glass Three Kerchiefed Girl Scouts

Inner Harbor Panorama

Inner Harbor and Cumulus Sky

Full set from the Baltimore Aquarium here. I haven’t been back to Baltimore for years, and I do miss seeing all you old friends from there, so expect me to visit more often.

Caturday!

Well, while we’re talking about time lapses, here’s one of Pandora lazing around her scratching rug, recorded with my SD1000’s time lapse video feature — a frame taken every two seconds over a span of about 15 minutes. You’ll see me drop in occasionally to give her catnip and Feline Greenies.

(I’m posting this late and back-dating it to Saturday. Sorry. I forgot yesterday because we were out.)

Owning the Clouds – Update

Update: An apology from 23/6, inaction from Google.

Update: Good news! I have uploaded my cloud time lapses to Vimeo. To emphasize the authenticity of the footage, I have uploaded the uncut version, with camera jostles and stretches of relatively empty sky that were edited out of the version more popularly distributed as various parodies out on the web.


Timelapse Clouds Compilation from brownpau on Vimeo.


My copyright woes with Google Video and 23/6 got attention from BoingBoing and Enturbulation Forums. Thanks to Cory for the link, and thank you all for your support and understanding in these trying times. A few updates are in order:

First off, the site is behaving weirdly because of intermittent permissions issues on comments and Movable Type dumping core and filling up disk space. A disk space allocation upgrade appears to have fixed the problems.

Google’s video-copyright notifier emailed to say the video was up, and some people have informed me they can see it now, but I still get a “video unavailable” page and a blank embed. This might be an upstream caching problem on my end, or it could be load-balancing sync lag on Google’s side. Either way, I hope the video starts working for everyone soon so that more Messages from Anonymous to Various Entities may be produced from the source material. (I would host it locally if I knew my bandwidth wouldn’t get hosed.)

I must also reiterate that I didn’t make the “A Message to Scientology from Anonymous” video; I simply did a bunch of silent webcam time lapses back in ’06, uploaded them, and pretty much forgot about them. When I saw that the videos had later gotten popular via derivative voiceover works, I was pleased and amused, and made no effort to claim infringement. In that stead, while I can claim copyright for the clip, I’m happy to let it go since the sharing is its own reward. When this is all done and my authorship is settled, I will explicitly release the video into the public domain.

One commenter has admonished me for not going through the official dispute procedure. I did go through the preliminary pre-dispute portion of the process last night, asking for identification of the user claiming my infringement, to which Google responded that the video would be allowed to stay up with 236.com’s permission. Only later did they suddenly disable my video without warning. Now I’m unclear as to whether this was a copyright-flagging bug which will be resolved — as Google’s video-copyright notifier does assert that the video should be back up — or if 23/6 actually decided to enforce an infringement claim after all. In any case, were I to file an official dispute now, it would have to be reviewed by at least one person there at Google, and it’s the Friday before the long Memorial Day weekend. Might as well wait till Tuesday.

At least one person has asked, in true /b/ fashion, to see proof of my authorship of the video by requesting that I capture the same scene again with me somewhere in the shot, plus screen name on a sign. Unfortunately I no longer live in the apartment with that view anymore, but this old photo, shot from the same window but in a different direction, has a building in the background that should look familiar to anyone acquainted with the video in question.

Many of you have asked if there’s anything you can do to help, and a few have mentioned DDOSes. No, and no. As the saying goes, Anonymous is not my personal army — in this case, even when the service is willingly offered. On my end this is really just about a buggy or mistaken infringement claim on a free two minute movie, and the problem for me should be cleared up by next week. But thank you, Anonymous; I love you so much more for your eagerness to come to a fellow’s aid.

Aside from my petty concern, what’s more important in the grander scheme is that Google acknowledge that its current automated copyright-protection scheme is imperfect and burdensome to amateur producers, especially when it flags as infringing an individual’s video that was (1) posted a good year and a half before the corporate claimant’s derivative video was ever uploaded; and (2) released to the internet in good faith that others would respect its free nature without aggressively claiming ownership of the work, overriding the hapless original producer’s authorship. Improvement is obviously still needed, not only to protect producers’ and distributors’ copyright, but also to protect the will of authors who wish to share free original content with the community.

More from BoingBoing, Enturbulation, and for once I’m rooting for the YouTube commenters.

Oh, and one last thing: what do you see here?

Update: An apology from 23/6, inaction from Google.

Owning the Clouds

Update: Please see “Owning the Clouds – Update.”


So, is the movie at right loading yet? Every moment that it does not load when the play button is clicked, and every moment that this returns an “unavailable” error page is another moment of Google Video denying me ownership of my own work.

Some of you will remember from this entry that I once made a series of timelapse videos of clouds above my apartment and let it out into the wild — into the public domain for all intents and purposes — where it later gained notoriety as the satirically ominous “Anonymous Message to Scientology,” which in turn became the root of other parodies along the same line — that of a robotic voice delivering intimidating messages through my cloud videos.

Three days ago, I received an email from copyright enforcement at Google Video stating that my video had been flagged as infringing by their Content Identification tool:

This is to notify you that your video “Timelapse Clouds Compilation” from your Google Video account has been disabled because it has been identified by our Content Identification tools as potentially lacking the necessary copyright authorization for use on the Google Video site. Content Identification is a program that analyzes similarities in audio or video between user videos and a library of reference content provided to us by copyright owners. When a video matches a reference file, that video is automatically disabled.

If you believe that this identification is a mistake, please click on the following link to learn how you can dispute this [link]

Please note: Repeat incidents of copyright infringement will result in the deletion of your account and all videos uploaded to that account. In order to avoid future strikes against your account, please delete any videos to which you do not have all rights, and refrain from uploading additional videos that infringe on the copyrights of others.

More information about Content Identification can be found at this link [link]

Sincerely,

The Google Video Team

On seeing this my first thought was that some big media outfit had probably used the video in a story about Anonymous, and Content Identification had made a false match between the clip and my work. I sent in a request as to which entity had made the copyright claim, and got back this response from video-copyright:

Hi Paulo,

The copyright owner, twentythreesix, has allowed your video to remain live on the site.

Sincerely,

The Google Team

Sure enough, Arianna Huffington’s comedy news site 236.com had posted a derivative parody to YouTube: “A Message to Rudy Giuliani,” which amusingly deviates somewhat from the standard “Message from Anonymous” pattern by pausing part way through while Anonymous fends off his mom. There’s the standard synthesized speech, the standard message from Anonymous, and of course, my cloud timelapse video — which now, I gather from the phrasing of the Googly copyright notice email, 236.com is now claiming to have copyright on.

This drove me into a violent fit of abject rage, and I sent out a pissy response, cc:’d to 236.com’s legal address and, as a cry of anguish directed to the very top, to Arianna Huffington herself:

Why, thank you! Please do convey to twentythreesix (23/6) that I am absolutely DRIPPING WITH GRATITUDE for so GRACIOUSLY permitting me to KEEP MY OWN VIDEO UP. Bad enough that their “Anonymous Message to Giuliani” was derived from the “Anonymous Message to Scientology” which used my original footage, now twentythreesix is still claiming COPYRIGHT ON THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE, and only letting me keep my own material up out of the GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS.

Of course, this might have been completely pointless. If I were to try and think the best of all involved, the phrasing on the Content Identification notice emails would imply that the people at 236.com have no idea this is even happening, and that the infringement notice and reply was simply auto-generated when the copyright bots saw a match between 236’s content and my own. This raises the issue, however, that Google Video’s content-flagging system is not only flawed (in that it failed to identify my video as the original, despite its having been published at a much earlier date than any of the “Message from Anonymous” videos that were ever uploaded), but also unfairly skewed towards big content producers, who get special copyright enforcement tools denied to casual amateur producers (like myself), who in turn lack the time and resources to effectively enforce their own copyright, and dispute claims such as this one.

I suppose it’s what I get for being nice and uploading those videos for anyone to use without expecting credit or payment in return — some big outfit was bound to take it, produce a thirdhand derivative work, and aggressively claim ownership at my expense. At this point, sending a takedown notice means that in the spirit of consistency I would need to send takedowns to all the other producers of “Message from Anonymous” parodies, and that would not only be too much trouble, but a major jerk move on my part. I’ll take the high road and let 236.com have their ball, but I’m posting this just so you know who really took those cloud videos. That should be enough to satisfy my ego.

(While I’m at it I should probably start moving stuff off of Google Video. Right after I posted this entry the cloud timelapse video disappeared. Now I’m speechless. So much for not being evil.)

Note: Please see “Owning the Clouds – Update.”

Artomatic (4-8)

Continuing Artomatic from where we left off two weekends ago, Amy and I did the rest of what we hadn’t yet visited, starting on the eighth floor and working our way down to the fourth. As before, a massive dump of links to artists whose work caught my attention such that I had to get a card:

(Sadly there were a few artists’ walls which had no cards, or just a URL written on the wall which I failed to remember or photograph, or artists who didn’t have websites. When an artist lacks a website or a physical, portable reminder of his or her work, this guarantees that, to most of the audience, the artist’s work just stays on that Artomatic wall and never comes back to mind, which is a loss.)

One notable genre of art missing from the whole exhibit was interactive digital art. One reason I’m so interested in Artomatic at all is that I’m thinking of bringing some of my conceptual content to Artomatic at some point in the future, and I need to know how one would go about setting up an internet-connected interactive art installation with screen and input devices open to the public — but safe from theft and damage. I think such a venture may prove more difficult than I had thought.